I will start my paper with an interesting introduction. I want to use a broad opening hook to draw the reader in. This will probably entail a quotation about communication about society. Then I will discuss the main points of my paper: 1) The effects of cell phones concerning knowledge 2) The effects of cell phones emotionally 3) The effects of cell phones socially. I will discuss all three briefly and then sum up my main point of the paper in my thesis statement. I will use "The
Innovation of Smartphones" article to present certain facts about phones and smart phones.
The first paragraph will show different types of areas where cell phones push forth knowledge and portions of life where they discourage knowledge. I will definitely be using blogs, social media, and wikipedia in this portion to show that a lot of the information online is not credible and that it can dumb you down because it is not from scholarly sources. I will also iterate that simple information and announcements are grand in these instances for knowledge. I will present statistics from my Kadlec source. Then I will present my stance on how I feel about the research given. This will be that I think we should discover more without the help of computers. They give us to many short cut answers.
Social media and texting at hand presents a lot of and dependency. Also social media is very fake and people can make a whole different person out of their face books compared to their actual face. I will be using the "Smartphones
Effect On Society" article as one of my sources here. I will use many interview type inputs for this section and then share how I feel about it.
Social media and texting at hand presents a lot of emotional destruction. People are poor in real life communication, and when it comes to real-life conversations they are not graceful. I will use "Smartphones Effect On Society"here as well. I have a very strong stance on this and will probably use personal stories to bring the reader to my level.
The conclusion will sum up the points and go back broad, but in a different sense than the introduction.
No comments:
Post a Comment